Posted by u/reutococco
[D] ICML26 new review policies
ICML26 introduced a review type selection, where the author can decide whether LLMs can be used during their paper review, according to these two policies: * **Policy A (Conservative):** Use of LLMs for reviewing is strictly prohibited. * **Policy B (Permissive):** * ***Allowed***: Use of LLMs to help understand the paper and related works, and polish reviews. Submissions can be fed to privacy-compliant\* LLMs. * ***Not allowed***: Ask LLMs about strengths/weaknesses, ask to suggest key points for the review, suggest an outline for the review, or write the full review *\*By “privacy-compliant”, we refer to LLM tools that do not use logged data for training and that place limits on data retention. This includes enterprise/institutional subscriptions to LLM APIs, consumer subscriptions with an explicit opt-out from training, and self-hosted LLMs. (We understand that this is an oversimplification.)* I'm struggling to decide which one to select, any suggestions?
More from r/MachineLearning
Nvidia: End-to-End Test-Time Training for Long Context aka Being Able To Update A Model's Weights In Real-Time As You Use It | "TTT changes the paradigm from retrieving info to learning it on the fly...the TTT model treats the context window as a dataset & trains itself on it in real-time." [R]
####TL;DR: The paper describes a mechanism that essentially turns the context window into a training dataset for a...
[P] I Gave Claude Code 9.5 Years of Health Data to Help Manage My Thyroid Disease
I have episodic Graves' disease, which has been difficult b/c its not chronic. Meds are up and down and often lag when...
[D] Why Mamba rewrote its core algorithm and Microsoft abandoned RetNet
Mamba-2 restructured its recurrence from parallel scans (10-20% Tensor Core utilization) to block-diagonal GEMMs...